{"id":216,"date":"2026-05-13T14:34:55","date_gmt":"2026-05-13T12:34:55","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/talkrank.app\/?page_id=216"},"modified":"2026-05-28T13:36:11","modified_gmt":"2026-05-28T11:36:11","slug":"kompetencje-miekkie","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/talkrank.app\/en\/kompetencje-miekkie\/","title":{"rendered":"Soft skills"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n \n <\/svg>\n All examples\n <\/a>\n Soft skills<\/span>\n

Verification of soft skills on the example of sales skills<\/h1>\n

How to check if a candidate can sell, talk to a client, and resolve objections before inviting them for an interview \u2013 without wasting hours on unsuitable candidates.<\/p>\n

\n \n <\/svg>\n 8 minutes\n <\/span>\n \n <\/svg>\n Simulation interview\n <\/span>\n \n <\/svg>\n Free mode - voice\n <\/span>\n \n <\/svg>\n Polish\n <\/span>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n<\/section>\n\n
\n
\n\n \n
\n
Problem<\/div>\n

Recruitment situation<\/h2>\n

Soft skills are the most difficult element of candidate evaluation. You can test knowledge and verify experience on a CV, but how can you truly assess whether someone can argue under pressure, handle a difficult conversation, or close negotiations when the other side resists? A traditional job interview doesn't demonstrate this \u2013 the candidate knows they're being assessed and responds based on how they want to be perceived, not how they actually behave.<\/p>\n

Talkrank verifies soft skills in a simulated interview where the candidate doesn't answer the recruiter's questions\u2014they must actually act. AI takes on a specific role and conducts the interview according to a pre-defined scenario. Candidates can't "meticulously" the answers\u2014they can only demonstrate their actual skills. Below is an example scenario for a B2B sales representative who must introduce a new product to a brick-and-mortar store and convince a skeptical owner to purchase.<\/p>\n <\/div>\n\n \n

\n
Scenario<\/div>\n

Talkrank Conversation Settings<\/h2>\n
\n
\n
\n
Conversation type<\/div>\n
Conversation simulation<\/div>\n <\/div>\n
\n
Mode<\/div>\n
Time-voice<\/div>\n <\/div>\n
\n
The language of conversation<\/div>\n
Polish<\/div>\n <\/div>\n
\n
The role of AI in conversation<\/div>\n
Skeptical grocery store owner<\/div>\n <\/div>\n
\n
Difficulty level<\/div>\n
\u2013 <\/div>\n <\/div>\n
\n
Talk time<\/div>\n
8 minutes<\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n
\n
AI conversation context used in this scenario:<\/div>\nYou own a medium-sized grocery store in your neighborhood. You have very limited shelf space and a proven supplier of well-known beverages that sell well. You're generally busy and wary of new suppliers, but open to them if you see potential and profit. You don't have time for a conversation because you haven't looked for any offers. You're skeptical about collaboration and need a strong argument to start a potential partnership because you're satisfied with the current beverage offerings from your current supplier.\n<\/div>\n
\n
What does this scenario verify?<\/div>\n